(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-13 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Is there any deeper meaning behind this? (Other than your general love of zombies and apocalyptic scenarios?)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-13 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
No idea. however, the way LJ is going, a zombiepocalypse can only be a good thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-13 10:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Yepp.
(And let's not forget: every apocalypse usually means the sole survivors get to have sex in the end. This is enough to make the prospect seem vaguely tempting.) *happily ignores the fact that her survival skills are zero*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-14 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waset.livejournal.com
hey, you are giving me ideas! *begins to plot*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-15 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waset.livejournal.com
how I love the smell of apoicalypse in the morning...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Especially if it is served in bed and with doughnuts.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-15 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] halokitty69.livejournal.com
Heh. An apocalypse is probably the only chance I have of getting laid LMAO!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-15 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Yes, that was my idea, too.
*is sexually frustrated*

Unfortunately, it'd probably go like this:
Newsspeaker: "blah... zombie attack... end of the world...blah"
SV: "YAY! APOCALYPSE! I'm getting laid!"
Zombie: *has snuck in the back door* Nope. Din'tcha hear the rules? Only the sole survivors get to have sex in the end! And also: BRAIIIIINZZZ!!!1!1!!"
SV: *gets eaten by zombie horde*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-15 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
Ewww... *shudders at the very idea* The only sex I like doesn't involve me and tends not to be very... reproductive.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-15 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
I understand your reserves about reproduction. *agrees* But why wouldn't it involve you? *is puzzled*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 12:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
Because I'm not really big on RL sex, to be honest, and since most sex after a zombiepocalypse would be to repopulate the planet... I think I'd rather just be eaten. Much simpler.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 05:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
No one said anything about repopulation... (In that case, eat me too, please!) I was referring more to the special kind of "We have lost everything and everyone we loved is dead" hurt-comfort sex.

I'm not really big on RL sex
O_o
I won't ask "Why?" or any further questions (or say "You just need to find the right guy", because that sentence is just plain awful). I guess it'd become rather too personal for your tastes. On second thought, I guess it already /was/ personal. *winces* Sorry! *writes "I must not try to discuss Skull Bearer's personal problems" 500 times on the blackboard*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
Heh, it doesn't matter. Asexual, remember?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
It's probably one of the many things in the universe I will never understand.

And you really shouldn't be able to write such wonderful porn then.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Perhaps it's not exactly asexual then. Perhaps there is some sort of extra category?
Or you've never had really good RL sex? (In which case I should probably have joined your not-quite-asexual category long ago, instead of still being such an unhappy nymphomaniac... ";-P)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
No, it's just that it's never looked appealing unless I'm really, really drunk, and everything looks appealing when your really, really drunk.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
True.
Remind me to get you really, really drunk the next time we meet. Ouch! *hides from the numerous blunt heavy objects thrown at her*
"X-D
But I guess nothing would look appealing, even when utterly drunk, if you truly were asexual. *continues tactless discussion*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-17 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waset.livejournal.com
Remind me to get you really, really drunk the next time we meet.

*nods in silent encouragement*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-17 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Thanks for jumping into the line of fire in front of me, but I'm afraid now she'll kill us both... ";-]

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
And even Wikipedia isn't at its most helpful. This ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_aversion_disorder ) was the closest I could find, but somehow whoever wrote this (anyway over-generalised) article, seems to assume that everyone has a partner and that a marital therapy is the best cure. *headdesk*
But I like his/her theory that it might be due to hormones or a lack of minerals in one's diet... (The former, okaaay, the latter, WTF?) And apparently there's no distinction between not wanting sex at all and not wanting sex with real people.

Wow, the toppic is complicated enough as to give me a headache. How fitting.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-16 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skull-bearer.livejournal.com
Or maybe, you know... I just don't like the idea? Full stop.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-17 09:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowvalkyrie.livejournal.com
Yepp, got it. *hides*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-13 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] avialle.livejournal.com
*is wondering the same . . . *

Or is the sky falling?

*finds an umbrella.*

just a thought...

Date: 2007-06-15 06:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] julian-howl.livejournal.com
Perhaps it is connected to this here: http://www.inweday.org/ Although the date seems to be a little off...

November 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3 4 56 7 89
10111213 1415 16
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios