![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I was watching the Intelligance Squared debate on whether the Catholic church is a force for good, since I missed it when it was on TV. You can find the first part of the debate here. it was Hitchins and Stephen Fry vs Ann Widdicomb and some Nigerian Bishop whose names escapes me. Result under cut if you don't want to be spoilered: They got creamed.
Seriously, it got to the point where I was watching the audience audibly booing the pro-team, and I was wondering - Is this the best the Catholic church can do? Is this all they have available? The biggest religion in the world? Okay, I have never seen Hitchins lose an argument against a religious person, and Stephen Fry is... Stephen Fry. The man's pracitically a national treasure for pete's sake, but seriously? A guy whose English is not the best, and who clearly hasn't realised what a den of lions he's just walked into, and the most annoying woman in the world? Widdicomb's voice alone should have warned people against choosing her, she was patronising, shallow, and either lying of she has a very incorrect grasp of history. I can't stand bad history so it is just as well I wasn't in the audience or I would have come on stage and throttled her for saying that the SS required members to give up their Catholic faith to join. WTF? Oh, and saying the catholic church did everything they could to stop the Holocaust? WTFWTFWTF
I hate to say this, but the Bishop had no idea what he was on about. He wasn't as annoying as Widdicomb, but it was embarrasing to watch him make a compelte ass of himself. Apart from at the end. Watching a Nigerian rantinng about how the Catholic church is doing more than anyone else to stop AIDS in Africa and that condoms don't work just made me want to firebomb him. He lives in Nigeria, he doesn't even have the excuse of being ignorant.
Needless to say, Hitchins and Fry curb-stomped them to raucous applause and the final vote was such a landslide it wasn't even funny.
Does anyone know anything about this? What was the rational behind sending such a pair of inept fools? Okay, anyone's going to look an inept fool in front of Fry and Hitchins, all we needed was Dawkins to complete the bingo of atheist heavyweights, but surely the Catholic church could come up with someone better? Was this a set up? Did the Catholic church think 'Okay, they sent in two white guys, we'll send in a black guy and a woman to appeal to the liberals'? As fun as it was to watch, surely the most powerful church in the world can do better than this.
Right?
Seriously, it got to the point where I was watching the audience audibly booing the pro-team, and I was wondering - Is this the best the Catholic church can do? Is this all they have available? The biggest religion in the world? Okay, I have never seen Hitchins lose an argument against a religious person, and Stephen Fry is... Stephen Fry. The man's pracitically a national treasure for pete's sake, but seriously? A guy whose English is not the best, and who clearly hasn't realised what a den of lions he's just walked into, and the most annoying woman in the world? Widdicomb's voice alone should have warned people against choosing her, she was patronising, shallow, and either lying of she has a very incorrect grasp of history. I can't stand bad history so it is just as well I wasn't in the audience or I would have come on stage and throttled her for saying that the SS required members to give up their Catholic faith to join. WTF? Oh, and saying the catholic church did everything they could to stop the Holocaust? WTFWTFWTF
I hate to say this, but the Bishop had no idea what he was on about. He wasn't as annoying as Widdicomb, but it was embarrasing to watch him make a compelte ass of himself. Apart from at the end. Watching a Nigerian rantinng about how the Catholic church is doing more than anyone else to stop AIDS in Africa and that condoms don't work just made me want to firebomb him. He lives in Nigeria, he doesn't even have the excuse of being ignorant.
Needless to say, Hitchins and Fry curb-stomped them to raucous applause and the final vote was such a landslide it wasn't even funny.
Does anyone know anything about this? What was the rational behind sending such a pair of inept fools? Okay, anyone's going to look an inept fool in front of Fry and Hitchins, all we needed was Dawkins to complete the bingo of atheist heavyweights, but surely the Catholic church could come up with someone better? Was this a set up? Did the Catholic church think 'Okay, they sent in two white guys, we'll send in a black guy and a woman to appeal to the liberals'? As fun as it was to watch, surely the most powerful church in the world can do better than this.
Right?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 08:00 am (UTC)Facepalm
(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 08:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 08:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 12:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 04:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 07:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-18 08:32 pm (UTC)In answer to your question...probably not. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-19 11:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-20 12:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-03-21 03:10 pm (UTC)